Polarison

Claude Sonnet 5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: pricing and benchmarks

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 85% cheaper on input tokens ($0.30 vs $2.00 per 1M). DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 88% cheaper on output tokens ($1.20 vs $10.00 per 1M). On our document Q&A workload (50,000 questions a month), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs $156.00 a month versus $1,100 for Claude Sonnet 5, 86% less. Epoch AI has not published a capability index score for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash yet.

Prices verified September 14, 2026.

Which should you choose?

Overall capability
Too close to call

Epoch AI has not published a capability index score for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash yet.

Price
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs $0.525 per 1M tokens (3:1 input-to-output mix) vs $4.00 for Claude Sonnet 5, 87% less.

Pricing and specs

Claude Sonnet 5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
ProviderAnthropicDeepSeek
API model IDclaude-sonnet-5deepseek-flash
Input / 1M tokens$2.00$0.30
Cached input / 1M tokens$0.20$0.006
Output / 1M tokens$10.00$1.20
Long-context rates
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Max output128K tokens384K tokens
Batch discount50% off

Benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index156.2
GPQA Diamond· Science reasoning87.4%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1–3)· Advanced math65.6%
SimpleQA Verified· Factual accuracy33.7%
ARC-AGI-2· Abstract reasoning
DeepSWE· Coding53.8%
APEX-Agents· Agentic work32.5%

Source: Epoch AI, best recorded result per model (CC BY 4.0). A dash means no published score. See all benchmarks

Monthly cost for real workloads

WorkloadClaude Sonnet 5DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDifference
Support chatbot
100,000 replies a month, ~1,500 input tokens (system prompt + history) and ~400 output tokens each.
$700.00$93.00DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 87% cheaper
Document Q&A (RAG)
50,000 questions a month with ~8,000 tokens of retrieved context and ~600 output tokens each.
$1,100$156.00DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 86% cheaper
Coding agent
10,000 agent steps a month, ~40,000 input tokens each (70% read from the prompt cache) and ~2,000 output tokens.
$496.00$61.68DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 88% cheaper

Estimates use standard list prices and ignore cache-write surcharges. Different tokenizers can count the same text differently, so test with your own prompts.

Claude Sonnet 5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cost calculator

Standard-tier list prices. Long-context rates apply automatically where the provider publishes a threshold. Excludes cache-write surcharges, taxes, batch and volume discounts.

Claude Sonnet 5 pricing notes

Anthropic’s best combination of speed and intelligence.

  • The $2 / $10 launch price is now the standard price; the planned rise to $3 / $15 will not happen.
  • Cache writes cost $2.50 (5-minute cache) or $4 (1-hour cache) per 1M tokens.
  • Uses Anthropic’s newer tokenizer, which produces roughly 30% more tokens for the same text.
Anthropic official pricing ↗

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash pricing notes

DeepSeek’s low-cost model with thinking and non-thinking modes, tool calls and vision input.

  • Prices shown are peak rates. Off-peak rates are half: peak hours are 01:00–04:00 and 06:00–10:00 UTC, Monday to Friday.
  • Compatible with both OpenAI-format and Anthropic-format APIs.
DeepSeek official pricing ↗

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5 cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 85% cheaper on input tokens ($0.30 vs $2.00 per 1M). DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 88% cheaper on output tokens ($1.20 vs $10.00 per 1M). On our document Q&A workload (50,000 questions a month), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs $156.00 a month versus $1,100 for Claude Sonnet 5, 86% less.
Which is more capable, Claude Sonnet 5 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?
Epoch AI has not published a capability index score for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash yet.
How much does Claude Sonnet 5 cost per 1M tokens?
Claude Sonnet 5 costs $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $10.00 per 1M output tokens, and $0.20 per 1M cached input tokens on Anthropic’s standard tier.
How much does DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cost per 1M tokens?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs $0.30 per 1M input tokens and $1.20 per 1M output tokens, and $0.006 per 1M cached input tokens on DeepSeek’s standard tier.
Which has the larger context window, Claude Sonnet 5 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?
Both offer a 1M-token context window.

Related comparisons